Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Mengenal Thibbun Nabawi dan Faktanya

Fakta Thibbun Nabawi: Habbatus Sauda, Madu, dan Minyak Zaitun - Saudaraku, tahukah kalian bahwa penyakit itu ada dua macam, penyakit hati dan penyakit jasmani? Kedua penyakit itu disebutkan dalam Al-Qur’an. Klasifikasi jenis penyakit ini mengandung hikmah ilahi dan kemukjizatan yang hanya bisa dicapai oleh kalangan medis di pertengahan abad ke-18. Sesungguhnya iman kepada Allah dan para Rasul, yaitu aqidah yang tertanam dalam hati, merupakan solusi pengobatan yang terpenting bagi hati, yakni bagi penyakit jiwa. Sedangkan untuk penyakit jasmani, kita bisa menengok metode pengobatan Nabi shallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam.

Istilah Thibbun Nabawi dimunculkan oleh para dokter muslim sekitar abad ke-13 M untuk menunjukkan ilmu-ilmu kedokteran yang berada dalam bingkai keimanan pada Allah, sehingga terjaga dari kesyirikan, takhayul dan khurofat.

1. Habbatus Sauda’ atau Jinten Hitam atau Syuwainiz
Imam Bukhari meriwayatkan dari ‘Aisyah radhiyallahu ‘anha. bahwa ia pernah mendengar Nabi shallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam bersabda yang artinya: “Sungguh dalam habbatus sauda’ itu terdapat penyembuh segala penyakit, kecuali as-sam.” Saya bertanya, “Apakah as-sam itu?” Beliau menjawab, “Kematian”. Habbatus sauda’ berkhasiat mengobati segala jenis penyakit dingin, bisa juga membantu kesembuhan berbagai penyakit panas karena faktor temporal. Biji habbatus sauda’ mengandung 40% minyak takasiri dan 1,4% minyak atsiri, 15 jenis asam amino, protein, Ca, Fe, Na dan K. kandungan aktifnya thymoquinone (TQ), dithymouinone (DTQ), thymohydroquimone (THQ) dan thymol (THY). Telah terbukti dari berbagai hasil penelitian ilmiah bahwa habbatus sauda’ mengaktifkan kekebalan spesifik/kekebalan didapat, karena ia meningkatkan kadar sel-sel T pembantu, sel-sel T penekan, dan sel-sel pembunuh alami. Beberapa resep penggunaan dan manfaat habbatus sauda’:
  1. Ditumbuk, dibuat adonan dangan campuran madu, kemudian diminum setelah dicampur air panas, diminum rutin berhari-hari: menghancurkan batu ginjal dan batu kandung kencing, memperlancar air seni, haid dan ASI.
  2. Diadon dengan air tepung basah atau tepung yang sudah dimasak, mampu mengeluarkan cacing dengan lebih kuat.
  3. Minum minyaknya kira-kira sesendok dicampur air untuk menghilangkan sesak napas dan sejenisnya.
  4. Dimasak dengan cuka dan dipakai berkumur-kumur untuk mengobati sakit gigi karena kedinginan.
  5. Digunakan sebagai pembalut dicampur cuka untuk mengatasi jerawat dan kudis bernanah.
  6. Ditumbuk halus, setiap hari dibalurkan ke luka gigitan anjing gila sebagian dua atau tiga kali oles, lalu dibersihkan dengan air.
Untuk konsumsi rutin menjaga kesehatan, sebaiknya dua sendok saja. Sebagian kalangan medis menyatakan bahwa terlalu banyak mengkonsumsinya bisa mematikan.
2. Madu atau ‘Asl
“Dari perut lebah itu keluar cairan dengan berbagai warna, di dalamnya terdapat kesembuhan bagi manusia.” (QS. An-Nahl: 69)
Beberapa hasil penelitian tentang madu:
a. Bakteri tidak mampu melawan madu
Dianjurkan memakai madu untuk mengobati luka bakar. Madu memiliki spesifikasi anti proses peradangan (inflammatory activity anti)
b. Madu kaya kandungan antioksidan
Antioksidan fenolat dalam madu memiliki daya aktif tinggi serta bisa meningkatkan perlawanan tubuh terhadap tekanan oksidasi (oxidative stress)
c. Madu dan kesehatan mulut
Bila digunakan untuk bersikat gigi bisa memutihkan dan menyehatkan gigi dan gusi, mengobati sariawan dan gangguan mulut lain.
d. Madu dan kulit kepala
Dengan menggunakan cairan madu berkadar 90% (madu dicampur air hangat) dua hari sekali di bagian-bagian yang terinfeksi di kepala dan wajah diurut pelan-pelan selama 2-3 menit, madu dapat membunuh kutu, menghilangkan ketombe, memanjangkan rambut, memperindah dan melembutkannya serta menyembuhkan penyakit kulit kepala.
e. Madu dan pengobatan kencing manis
Madu mampu menurunkan kadar glukosa darah penderita diabetes karena adanya unsure antioksidan yang menjadikan asimilasi gula lebih mudah di dalam darah sehingga kadar gula tersebut tidak terlihat tinggi. Madu nutrisi kaya vitamin B1, B5, dan C dimana para penderita diabetes sangat membutuhkan vitamin-vitamin ini. Sesendok kecil madu alami murni akan menambah cepat dan besar kandungan gula dalam darah, sehingga akan menstimulasi sel-sel pankreas untuk memproduksi insulin. Sebaiknya penderita diabetes melakukan analisis darah dahulu untuk menentukan takaran yang diperbolehkan untuknya di bawah pengawasan dokter.
f. Madu mencegah terjadinya radang usus besar (colitis), maag dan tukak lambung
Madu berperan baik melindungi kolon dari luka-luka yang biasa ditimbulkan oleh asam asetat dan membantu pengobatan infeksi lambung (maag). Pada kadar 20% madu mampu melemahkan bakteri pylori penyebab tukak lambung di piring percobaan.
g. Selain itu madu amat bergizi, melembutkan sistem alami tubuh, menghilangkan rasa obat yang tidak enak, membersihkan liver, memperlancar buang air kecil, cocok untuk mengobati batuk berdahak. Buah-buahan yang direndam dalam madu bisa bertahan sampai enam bulan.
Madu terbaik adalah yang paling jernih, putih dan tidak tajam serta yang paling manis. Madu yang diambil dari daerah gunung dan pepohonan liar memiliki keutamaan tersendiri daripada yang diambil dari sarang biasa, dan itu tergantung pada tempat para lebah berburu makanannya.
3. Minyak Zaitun
“Konsumsilah minyak zaitun dan gunakan sebagai minyak rambut, karena minyak zaitun dibuat dari pohon yang penuh berkah.” (HR. At-Tirmidzi dan Ibnu Majah).
Fungsi minyak zaitun:
  1. Mengurangi kolesterol berbahaya tanpa mengurangi kandungan kolesterol yang bermanfaat.
  2. Mengurangi risiko penyumbatan (trombosis) dan penebalan (ateriosklerosis) pembuluh darah.
  3. Mengurangi pemakaian obat-obatan penurun tekanan darah tinggi.
  4. Mengurangi serangan kanker.
  5. Melindungi dari serangan kanker payudara. Sesendok makan minyak zaitun setiap hari mengurangi risiko kanker payudara sampai pada kadar 45%.
  6. Menurunkan risiko kanker rahim sampai 26%.
  7. Pengkonsumsian buah-buahan, sayuran, dan minyak zaitun memiliki peran penting dalam melindungi tubuh dari kanker kolon.
  8. Penggunaan minyak zaitun sebagai krim kulit setelah berenang melindungi terjadinya kanker kulit (melanoma)
  9. Berpengaruh positif melindungi tubuh dari kanker lambung dan mengurangi risiko tukak lambung.
  10. Mengandung lemak terbaik yang seharusnya dikonsumsi manusia seperti yang terdapat dalam ASI.
  11. Penggunaan sebagai minyak rambut mampu membunuh kutu dalam waktu beberapa jam saja.
Setiap penyakit itu ada obatnya, seperti hadits Rasulullah shallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam yang artinya: “Tidaklah Allah menurunkan suatu penyakit, melainkan Dia menurunkan obatnya.” (HR. Bukhari dan Muslim) Setiap kali Allah menurunkan penyakit, Allah pasti menurunkan penyembuhnya. Hanya ada orang yang mengetahuinya dan ada yang tidak mengetahuinya. Jauh sebelum ilmu pengetahuan berkembang pesat, Nabi shallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam sudah mengetahui dan menerapkan pengobatan yang terbukti kemanjurannya.

Maraji:
  1. Keajaiban Thibbun Nabawi, Aiman bin ‘Abdul Fattah
  2. Metode Pengobatan Nabi SAW, Ibnu Qayyim Al-Jauziyah
sumber : 
  • Penyusun: Ummu Hajar
  • http://muslimah.or.id/kesehatan-muslimah/fakta-thibbun-nabawi-habbatus-sauda-madu-dan-minyak-zaitun.html

Monday, February 20, 2012

Dengan Berpuasa Terbukti Bisa Perangi Kanker

Selain sebagai ajaran agama, berpuasa ternyata juga membantu memerangi penyakit berbahaya, seperti kanker. Sebuah penelitian di Universitas Southern California, Amerika serikat, menemukan jika puasa bisa membantu memerangi kanker dan meningkatkan efektivitas pengobatan.

ilustrasi kankerDalam percobaan pada tikus, para peneliti menemukan sel tumor merespons berbeda terhadap stres yang ditimbulkan saat berpuasa dibandingkan sel normal. Sel-sel yang diketahui sebagai penyakit itu terus tumbuh dan membagi, pada akhirnya menghancurkan diri mereka sendiri.

"Sel ini, pada kenyataannya melakukan bunuh diri. Apa yang kami lihat adalah bahwa sel kanker berusaha untuk mengkompensasi kekurangan dari semua hal yang hilang dalam darah setelah puasa," ungkap Profesor Valter Longo, pemimpin penelitian tersebut.

Bahkan, berpuasa dapat memberikan pengobatan kepada penderit tanpa kemoterapi. Hal itu ditunjukkan dengan memperlambat pertumbuhan kanker payudara, kanker kulit melanoma, kanker glioma otak dan neuroblastoma atau kanker yang terbentuk di jaringan saraf.

Peneliti menyarankan, dalam setiap kasus, menggabungkan puasa dengan kemoterapi membuat pengobatan kanker lebih efektif.
Pria Perokok

Sementara itu, studi lain yang dilakukan oleh para peneliti di Inggris menyatakan bahwa laki-laki yang merokok mengalami penurunan fungsi otak lebih cepat dibanding dengan mereka yang tidak merokok.

Organisasi Kesehatan Dunia (WHO) menyatakan bahwa kebiasaan merokok merupakan salah satu ancaman terbesar kesehatan masyarakat yang dihadapi dunia. Penelitian yang juga dikutip dari Reuters ini menunjukkan adanya penurunan fungsi kognitif pada laki-laki perokok, berupa gangguan pada memori, seperti lupa meletakkan sesuatu, atau lupa kejadian sehari-hari.

"Meskipun kami sadar bahwa merokok merupakan faktor risiko untuk penyakit pernapasan, kanker, dan penyakit kardiovaskular, penelitian ini menunjukkan juga efek yang merugikan pada penurunan kognitif dan ini terbukti sejak 45 tahun," kata Severine Sabia dari University College London, sang ketua penelitian.

Penelitian yang dipublikasikan dalam Archives of General Psychiatry jurnal menyebutkan, seorang laki-laki perokok mengalami penurunan kognitif sama seperti laki-laki tidak merokok yang berusia sepuluh tahun lebih tua darinya.



sumber : http://www.hidayatullah.com/read/21102/11/02/2012/puasa-terbukti-bantu-perangi-kanker.html

Friday, February 17, 2012

Benarkah Tabut Nabi Musa Masih Ada Sampai Sekarang

Tabut Perjanjian (The Ark of Covenant) dianggap oleh beberapa pihak sebagai misteri terbesar dari semua harta yang tersembunyi. Sampai saat ini benda bersejarah sekaligus benda misterius ini tetap menjadi tujuan dari setiap arkeolog modern dalam petualangannya. Tabut Perjanjian ini berisi sepuluh perintah yang ditulis di atas lempengan batu oleh Tuhan kepada Musa di Gunung Sinai.

Sepuluh Perintah Allah merupakan dasar perjanjian Allah dengan anak-anak Israel, yang terukir pada dua loh batu yang mengandung titah Tuhan bagi bani Israel. Menurut literatu Ibrani, Tabut sendiri adala sebuah peti yang dibuat oleh pengrajin dari Bezalel. Bentuknya terbuat dari kayu akasia dan dilapisi oleh emas. Memiliki panjang 1,5 meter, lebar 0,7 meter dan tinggi juga 0,7 meter.

Visualisasi Tabut Perjanjian 

Visualisasi Tabut Perjanjian
Bangsa Israel menurut kisah mereka selalu membawa Tabut sepanjang mereka mengembara di padang gurun. Tabut ini mereka yakini memiliki kekuatan misterius terhadap musuh-musuh Israel. Menurut Alkitab, tembok-tembok Yerikho pun runtuh Ketika orang-orang Yahudi berjalan berkeliling dengan lembaran yang ada dalam Tabut perjanjian.
Setelah Kuil Pertama dibangun, Raja Salomo menempatkan Tabut Perjanjian di Bait Allah. Tabut Perjanjian itu disimpan di ruang khusus dalam Bait Suci yang disebut Kodesh Kodashim.

Tidak seorang pun diizinkan memasukinya kecuali Imam-imam tinggi Yahudi. Mereka pun hanya diperbolehkan masuk sekali dalam setahun yakni dalam momen Yom Kippur, yakni hari yang dianggap paling suci dalam agama Yahudi. Perayaan ini jatuh pada tanggal 10 Tisyri dalam kalender Yahudi.

Namun dalam catatan sejarah, tahun 586 SM Kerajaan Yehuda diserbu oleh Kekaisaran Babilonia dibawah Nebukadnezard, dan kuil pun dihancurkan termasuk di dalamnya Tabut Perjanjian.

Hingga kini, beribu tahu pasca kejadian itu, Zionis Israel pun berusaha keras untuk mencari Tabut Perjanjian yang hilang. Konon menurut mereka, Tabut tersebut dipercaya memiliki kekuatan ghaib yang akan memberikan sentuhan sihir yang luar biasa kepada siapa pun yang menguasainya. Mereka pun juga digerakkan oleh faktor teologis dimana mereka meyakini bahwa Tabut adalah Mukjizat yang diberikan Tuhan kepada bangsa Yahudi. Sedangkan menurut Kitab Injil, Tabut merupakan sumber kekuatan tuhan yang bersemayam di dalamnya. Kekuatan tersebut antara lain:

• Membakar semua duri, membunuh ular dan kalajengking, serta mengeringkan air sungai dan meluapkanya kembali (Kitab Yosua 3: 15-17, 4: 10, dan 11: 18)
• Dapat menenangkan peperangan (Yosua 6:1-20).
• Memberi kemalangan kepada musuh yang menguasai Tabut, Digambarkan sebagai nenek moyang bangsa palestina (Kitab Samuel 6:5)

Namun sebagai umat muslim tentunya kita memiliki patokan sendiri dalam menjelaskan tabut. Kitab injil yang sudah diselewengkan oleh kaum Yahudi tidak bisa lagi dijadikan sandaran dalam menjelaskan mengenai Tabut ini. Penjelasan Injil sudah penuh dengan nuansa paganistik yang dipengaruhi oleh akar Kabbalah. Oleh karenanya sebagai umat Nabi Muhammad SAW sudah seharusnya kita berlepas diri dari anggapan bahwa Tabut memiliki kekuatan mistis bagi orang yang menemukannya, karena sejatinya kekuatan itu hanyalah milik Allah.

Dalam Al Qur’an, penjelasan mengenai Tabut terangkum dalam surah Al Baqarah ayat 248, “dan Nabi mereka mengatakan kepada mereka: "Sesungguhnya tanda ia akan menjadi Raja, ialah kembalinya tabut kepadamu, di dalamnya terdapat ketenangan dari Tuhanmu dan sisa dari peninggalan keluarga Musa dan keluarga Harun; tabut itu dibawa malaikat. Sesungguhnya pada yang demikian itu terdapat tanda bagimu, jika kamu orang yang beriman.”

Kisah Al Baqarah ayat 248 hanyalah satu buah epik dari rangkaian cerita perperangan Bani Israel. Kisah ini bercerita tentang pasukan Thalut yang melawan Jalut dimana pada akhirnya Daud memenangkan duel melawan Jalut.

Menurut Ath Thobari makna dari bunyi ayat "Sesungguhnya tanda ia akan menjadi Raja, ialah kembalinya tabut kepadamu” adalah tanda-tanda Thalut akan menjadi raja.
Sesungguhnya Allah telah mengutus seorang raja kepada kalian walaupun bukan dari keturunan raja—adalah “dikembalikannya tabut yang didalamnya terdapat ketenangan dari Tuhanmu.” Ia adalah tabut yang selalu dibawa oleh Bani Israil saat bertemu dengan musuh, bergerak bersamanya sehingga musuh tidak mampu menghadapi mereka dan tidak bisa mengalahkan mereka. Namun kemudian mereka mengabaikan perintah Allah swt, banyak berselisih dengan para nabi mereka, sehingga Allah swt melepaskan tabut itu dari tangan mereka kemudian dikembalikan lagi dan dirampas lagi pada waktu yang lain dan tidak dikembalikan lagi bahkan tidak akan sekali-kali dikembalikan kepada mereka selana-lamanya.

Namun dalam versi lainnya, Tabut sendiri konon sudah dihancurkan oleh Nabi Musa as sesaat ia turun dari gunung Sinai untuk menerima 10 perintah Tuhan bersamaan dengan Loh Batu. Kaum Bani Israel yang sedianya berjanji untuk beribadah kepada Allah kembali berbuat kufur dengan menyembah patung sapi emas saat ditinggal Nabi Musa as ke Gunung Sinai. Kekesalan Nabi Musa as membuatnya membanting dan menghancurkan Tabut bersamaan dengan Loh Batu. Tapi lagi-lagi ini masih menjadi perdebatan, ada yang mengatakan Nabi Musa as hanya menghancurkan Loh Batu yang berisi 10 perintah Tuhan tidak beserta dengan Tabut. Tapi yang jelas kisah ini terekam dengan baik di dalam Al Qur’an, sebagai pelajaran bagi kita semua.

“Dan (ingatlah), ketika Kami berjanji kepada Musa (memberikan Taurat, sesudah) empat puluh malam, lalu kamu menjadikan anak lembu (sembahan) sepeninggalnya dan kamu adalah orang-orang yang zalim. Kemudian sesudah itu Kami maafkan kesalahanmu, agar kamu bersyukur. Dan (ingatlah), ketika Kami berikan kepada Musa Al kitab (Taurat) dan keterangan yang membedakan antara yang benar dan yang salah, agar kamu mendapat petunjuk.” (Al Baqarah: ayat 51-53)

Dalam melihat Tabut yang diyakini masih ada dan terus dicari oleh Yahudi, kita bisa menganalisa tiga hal dibalik itu semua. Pertama, Teologi Kebencian. Keberadaan Tabut di Masjid Al Quds adalah rekayasa mereka untuk menguasai Yerusalem. Dengan meyakini bahwa Tabut tersimpan dalam fondasi Al Quds, mereka bergerak mencari Tabut hingga mengeruk fondasi dasar mesjid yang pernah menjadi kiblat umat muslim ini. Kehancuran Mesjid Al Quds akan menjadi kebanggan tersendiri bagi mereka yang memang menaruh kebencian kepada kaum muslimin.

Selanjutnya, faktor kedua adalah motivasi paganistik-kabbalah yang mempercayai kesaktian Tabut. Mereka yang menemukan Tabut dipercaya akan mengalami transferisasi kekuatan mistik ke dalam tubuh dan jiwa mereka.

Masjidil Aqsha, sasaran penghancuran Yahudi
yahudi

Masjidil Aqsha, sasaran penghancuran Yahudi
Ketiga, faktor teologis-politis. Selama ini kaum zionis, masih menganggap bahwa Tabut adalah karunia atau mu’jizat yang diberikan Tuhan kepada orang-orang Yahudi. Mereka meyakini apabila tabut itu berhasil ditemukan maka keagungan dan kejayaan mereka akan kembali dan dapat menguasai dunia lagi.

Namun, sekalipun Tabut masih ada dan Yahudi berhasil menemukannya, dengan akal sehat saja kita bisa mencerna: mana mungkin Allah memberikan rahmat dan mukjizat kepada bangsa yang terus membunuh nabi-nabiNya dan ingkar terhadap ajaranNya.
“Sesungguhnya kamu dapati orang-orang yang paling keras permusuhannya terhadap orang-orang yang beriman ialah orang-orang Yahudi dan orang-orang musyrik.” (QS.Al Ma’idah : 82)

"Dan sesungguhnya telah kamu ketahui orang-orang yang melanggar di antaramu pada hari Sabtu, lalu Kami berfirman kepada mereka, "Jadilah kamu kera yang hina." (QS Al-Baqarah: 65). Allahua'lam. 

Sumber

Friday, January 20, 2012

How was Islam Spread?

Islam, in the tenth century, was the main religion, or at least, the religion of the majority of nations in an area covering more than half of the civilized world stretching over three continents from the Pyrenees and Siberia in West and North Europe to the farthest end of Asia, up to China and New Guinea in the East; from Morocco in North Africa to the southern tip of Africa, covering two-thirds of the African continent. It is one of the most striking facts of human history that the spread of Islam over such a vast area took place within three centuries. Most striking of all, within half a century after the Hijrah (Prophet Muhammad's Migration from Makkah to Al-Madeenah), Islam had already conquered the whole of North Africa from Egypt to Morocco, all the Middle Eastern lands from Yemen to Caucasia and from Egypt to the lands beyond Transoxiana (portion of Central Asia corresponding approximately with modern-day Uzbekistan and southwest Kazakhstan). It was during the reign of the third Caliph 'Uthmaan  may  Allaah  be  pleased  with  him that the Muslim envoys reached the Chinese Palace, where they were welcomed enthusiastically, an important event marking, according to the historians, the beginning of Islam's entry into this country. There are many reasons why nations have been, from past to the present, so ready to embrace Islam, what is pointed out by Muhammad Asad, a Jewish convert to Islam, probably being the foremost:

Islam appears like a perfect work of architecture
Islam appears to me like a perfect work of architecture. All its parts are harmoniously conceived to complement and support each other, nothing lacking, with the result of an absolute balance and solid composure. Everything in the teaching and postulate of Islam is in its proper place. (Islam at the Crossroads, p.5)

Islam was spread by force of the sword
Most of Western writers, especially under the influence of the Church, have never failed to accuse Islam of spreading by force of the sword. The causes of this prejudice lie mainly in the fact that the spread of Islam has often occurred at the expense of Christianity. While Islam has, for centuries, obtained numerous conversions from Christianity without much effort or organized missionary activities, Christianity has almost never been able to achieve conversions from Islam in spite of sophisticated means and well-organized missionary activities, and it has always been at a disadvantage in its competition with Islam for fourteen centuries. This has caused its missionaries and most of the orientalists to develop a complex within themselves by depicting Islam and introducing it as a regressive, vulgar religion of savage people. The same attitude has unfortunately maintained toward the Holy Prophet of Islam. This is clear in the confessions of some unbiased writers of the West: According to P. Bayle,

Muslims, according to the principles of their faith, are under an obligation to use force for the purpose of bringing other religions to ruin (probably he means Jihaad which is not for the purpose he suggests); yet, in spite of that, they have been tolerating other religions for some centuries past. The Christians have not been given orders to do anything but preach and instruct, yet, despite this, from time immemorial they have been exterminating by fire and sword all those who are not of their religion […] We may feel certain that if Western Christians, instead of the Saracens and the Turks, had won the dominion over Asia, there would be today not a trace left of the Greek Church, and that they would never have tolerated Muhammadanism as the 'infidels' have tolerated Christianity there. We (Christians) enjoy the fine advantage of being far better versed than others in the art of killing, bombarding and exterminating the Human Race." (Bayle P., Dictionary, 'the article Mahomed', 1850)

To what is Islam indebted its unequaled spread?
Islam is indebted its unequaled spread to its religious content and values, which is confessed by all objective Western intellectuals:

Many have sought to answer the questions of why the triumph of Islam was so speedy and complete? Why have so many millions embraced the religion of Islam and scarcely a hundred ever recanted? Some have attempted to explain the first overwhelming success of Islam by the argument of the Sword. They forget Carlyle's laconic reply. First get your sword. You must win men's hearts before you can induce them to imperil their lives for you; and the first conquerors of Islam must have been made Muslims before they were made fighters on the Path of God. Others allege the low morality of the religion and the sensual paradise it promises as a sufficient cause for the zeal of its followers: but even were these admitted to the full, no religion has ever gained a lasting hold upon the souls of men by the force of its sensual permissions and fleshy promises...

In all these explanations the religion itself is left out of the question. Decidedly, Islam itself was the main cause for its triumph. Islam not only was at once accepted (by many peoples and races) by Arabia, Syria, Persia, Egypt, Northern Africa and Spain, at its first outburst; but, with the exception of Spain, it has never lost its vantage ground; it has been spreading ever since it came into being. Admitting the mixed causes that contributed to the rapidity of the first swift spread of Islam, they do not account for the duration of Islam. There must be something in the religion itself to explain its persistence and spread, and to account for its present hold over so large of a proportion of the dwellers on the earth... Islam has stirred an enthusiasm that has never been surpassed. Islam has had its martyrs, its self-tormentors, its recluses, who have renounced all that life offered and have accepted death with a smile for the sake of the faith that was in them. (Stanley Lane-Poole, Study in a Mosque, pp.86-89)

A. J. Arberry has also pointed out that the reason for the spread of Islam is Islam itself and its religious values. (Aspects of Islamic Civilization, p.12) He states:
The rapidity of the spread of Islam, noticeably through extensive provinces which had been long Christian, is a crucial fact of history […] The sublime rhetoric of the Quran, that inimitable symphony, the very sounds of which move men to tears and ecstasy". (M. Pickhtal, The Meaning of the Glorious Quran, p.vii)
Arberry continues:

This, and the urgency of the simple message carried, holds the key to the mystery of one of the greatest cataclysms in the history of religion. When all military, political and economic factors have been exhausted, the religious impulse must still be recognized as the most vital and enduring.
Brockelman, who is usually very unsympathetic and partial, also recognizes the religious values of Islam as the main factor for the spread of Islam. (History of the Islamic Peoples, p.37) Rosenthal makes his point as follows:

The more important factor for the spread of Islam is religious law of Islam (Sharee'ah which is an inclusive, all-embracing, all-comprehensive way of thinking and living) which was designed to cover all manifestations of life. (Political Thought in Medieval Islam, p.21) 

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Remembering Last Year, Sheikh Abdul Aziz Al Sheibi Returned to Allah at Age 82

Inna lilahi wa inna ilayhi rajioon - Quran
(from Allah we came and to Allah is our return)

Mourning the loss of a good servant of Allah and the Kaaba.
Sheikh Abdul-Aziz Al-Sheibi. His family are known as
The keepers of the Key to the Kabah.

 
It has already been a year since the beloved Sheikh Abdul-Aziz Al-Sheibi, keeper of the Holy Ka’aba’s door key, passed away. He was 82 years old. That was November 11, 2010 at about 3 AM Sunday morning in Makkah 2 Dhul-Hijja 1431 Hijri.
 
Sheikh had suffered a heart attack. He had been suffering from some illness and pains in his chest when he was taken to the Jeddah International Hospital. His illness had kept him confined to a wheel chair for many years.
Pictured here two years ago (2009) he is seen receiving the new Kiswa from Sheikh Saleh Al-Husseyan, of the office of Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques.
Al-Sheibi passed away just hours before he was to officially transfer the new kiswa or black cover to the Ka’aba at the beginning of the Hajj month this year. The total cost of the cloth over the Ka’aba was more than 20 million riyals (£3.3 mn, USD5.3mn). The cover is 658 sq. metres long, and is made of 670 kilograms of pure silk. For embroidery, 15 kg of gold thread was used. It consists of 47 pieces of cloth, and each piece is 14 metres long and 101 cm broad. The black cover (kiswa), replaced anew annually, is draped on the Ka’aba and fixed to the ground with copper rings.

Earlier this year (March 2011) the sons of Al-Sheibi invited me and my troup from Guide US TV to visit their home. At that time his son honored us and Guide US TV with the most treasured of the pieces of kiswa Sheikh Abdul Aziz Asheibi had possessed. His son presented the piece of kiswa to us while our cameraman filmed it all. The size is at least double those pictured (above) in this article,  and although it is larger in size ,the true value is in what these represent. To remember Allah, the Almighty One God and His Names is the ultimate and only true value. The piece of kiswa they presented us with has the word in Arabic: 

"Ar-Rahman" (The Most Merciful)
He was buried at Mua’la Cemetery in the sacred enclosure next to Sayyida Khadija, Prophet Muhammad’s wife, after funeral prayers at the Grand Mosque in Makkah.
The Bani Shaiba is an Islamic tribe that hold the key to the Ka’aba. Prophet Muhammad (May Peace and Blessings be upon him) handed the key to Bani Shaiba in the year of the conquest of Makkah, and said, “Take it, O Bani Talha, eternally up to the Day of Resurrection, and it will not be taken from you unless by an unjust, oppressive tyrant.” The family has held the key for the past 15 centuries.

The King of Saudi Arabia has to seek the permission from the senior member of the Al-Sheibi family before he can enter the Ka’aba.

Janaza of sheikh Al-Sheibi -- King Abdullah bin Abdul-Aziz telephoned the family and the sons of Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah Al-Sheibi to offer his condolences and sympathy to the Al-Sheibi family.

The 70 cm, gold-and-platinum Ka’aba key is painted in Islamic green with a glazed gold head. Verses from Qur’an are engraved on either side. The key leaves its locked cabinet twice a year, when the Saudi king opens the Ka’aba’s door for cleaning of the interior and change of its black cover, as well as when he takes Muslim heads of states on a visit to the Ka’aba.

Al-Sheibi had kept the key for the past 18 years, before his retirement; he held the position of Director General of Religious Affairs and Mosques in Makkah at the Ministry of Hajj.
He has four sons: Talal, Hashem, Marwan and Nizar. The brother of the deceased, Abdul Qader Al-Sheibi, who is now the key-bearer of the Ka’aba, said his brother’s death was painful for him, and “the pain gets harder when I open the Ka’aba’s door and memories come to me, but it is Allah’s will.” A number of Makkah’s residents expressed their sorrow at losing Al-Sheibi. Among the comments made was that Mecca has lost a “good son” and a “pious sheikh” and “our hearts are full of pain and our souls sad”.

Sheikh Abdul-Aziz Al-Sheibi was a very dear friend to many. He once had said, "I hold the key to the holy Ka’aba, what better honor can a Muslim crave in this world."
He was the last of his generation and a very modest and humble servant of the Ka’aba. He lived a simple life at his small house. The family has a book with their linage or family tree going back to Usman Bin Talha, who was given the key by the Prophet, peace be upon him, and a signed book by Al-Sheibi. As the years go by we will all definitely miss him.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

The Achievements of Omar ibn al Khattab

Summary: Summary: History bends to the will of man when it is exercised with faith and steadfastness. Omar (r) was one such man. He bent history to his will, leaving a legacy that successor generations have looked upon as a model to copy. He was one of the greatest of conquerors, a wise administrator, a just ruler, a monumental builder and a man of piety who loved God with the same intensity that other conquerors of his caliber have loved gold and wealth. The Prophet planted the seed of Tawhid. At its most elemental level, Tawhid means belief in one God. In its historical sense, it connotes a God-focused civilization, where all human effort is directed towards seeking Divine pleasure. Abu Bakr (r), with his wise intercession at an historic moment, ensured that the seed did not perish with the death of the Prophet. It was during the Caliphate of Omar (r) that the seed grew into a full-blown tree and bore fruit. Omar (r) shaped the historical edifice of Islam and whatever Islam became or did not become in subsequent centuries is due primarily to the work of this historical figure. Indeed, Omar (r) was the architect of Islamic civilization.

The achievements of Omar ibn al Khattab (r) are all the more remarkable considering that he lacked the advantage of birth, nobility or wealth that some of the other Companions enjoyed. He was born into the tribe of Bani ‘Adi, a poorer cousin amongst the Quraish. In his own words, before he accepted Islam, he was at various times a petty merchant and a shepherd who would often lose his sheep. From such humble beginnings, he rose to weld together an empire greater in extent than either that of Rome or Persia and governed it with the wisdom of a Solomon and administered it with the sagacity of a Joseph.

Upon his election to the Caliphate, Omar (r) was faced with the immediate geopolitical situation in West Asia. The Arabian Peninsula is a vast desert, except for its southwestern tip near Najran and Yemen, where the monsoons bring in rain from the Indian Ocean and make the area fertile. To the north, the extent of the desert is marked by the Jordan River, which separates it from the hills of Palestine and Lebanon. To the east, its boundaries are marked by the Euphrates. The area between the Rivers Euphrates and Tigris is called the Jazira (island). This area, known in ancient times as Mesopotamia, was called Iraq e Arab in the early Islamic period. The waters of the two rivers irrigate this area and have made it the cradle of civilizations. East of the River Tigris, the land gradually rises into the Persian Plateau leading into the heartland of ancient Fars. The Arabs called this area Iraq e Ajam and it included the Farsi (Persian) speaking areas of Khuzistan, Hamadan, Fars, Persepolis, Isfahan, Azerbaijan, Khorasan, Makran and Baluchistan.

The Persian and Byzantine empires held the balance of power in the region with the Euphrates River as the historical divide between their respective areas of influence. Persia also controlled Yemen and the territories along the Red Sea north to Mecca and Madina. The emergence of Islam and the unification of the Arabs altered this balance of power. It was a situation that neither the Byzantines nor the Persians could ignore. Khosroe, the emperor of Persia, was on record as having ordered an assault on Madina. The Byzantines had attacked on the northern frontier and had killed the Muslim general Zaid bin Haris (632). Border clashes had begun during the Caliphate of Abu Bakr (r) between the newborn Islamic state and the two superpowers. The triumph of Omar (r) over the mighty empires of Persia and Byzantium within a brief span of ten years is one of the most remarkable stories in military history.

The Muslim eruption was impelled by a sense of mission inculcated by Islam. It was a matter of faith. This faith dictated that humankind is born into freedom and is beholden only to the transcendence of God. Islamic civilization is God-centered and its mission is to establish Divine patterns upon this earth. From this perspective, any social or political system that imposed subservience to a despotic ruler or an oppressive empire detracted from this transcendence and deserved to be challenged.

When Omar (r) became the Caliph, the campaigns in Syria were ongoing. The Battle of Yarmuk (636) had broken Byzantine resistance but Palestine was not yet subdued. Omar (r) commanded Amr bin al As to proceed from Yarmuk to Jerusalem. Since resistance was hopeless, the Patriarch of Jerusalem offered the keys to the city provided the Caliph himself came up to accept them. When the Caliph heard of this, he appointed Ali ibn Abu Talib (r) as the acting Caliph and set out north from Madina. Omar ibn al Khattab (r) was now the Caliph of all of Arabia and of surrounding territories. He could have traveled as a conqueror in pomp and luxury. But he, like the other Companions, had received his training from the Prophet Muhammed (p). Theirs was the kingdom of heaven and not of this earth. They held the key to the treasures of the earth but only as a Divine Trust as servants of the Lord. Omar (r) traveled north on one camel with a single attendant, taking turns with him for the ride. As he approached Jerusalem, it so happened, the attendant was on the camel and the Caliph was walking alongside. The potentates of Jerusalem thought that the rider was the Caliph and the man on foot, in his patched clothes, was the servant. They offered abeyance to the rider. When the Muslim commanders greeted the real Caliph, the potentates of Jerusalem were astonished and bowed down in awe.

Omar (r) treated the conquered people with unsurpassed magnanimity. The capitulation document signed with the Christians upon the fall of Jerusalem provides an example:

“This is the safety given by a servant of God, the leader of the faithful, Omar ibn al Khattab (r) to the people of Ilia. This safety is for their life, property, church and cross, for the healthy and the sick and for all their co-religionists. Their churches shall neither be used as residence nor shall they be demolished. No harm shall be done to their churches or their boundaries. There shall be no decrease in their crosses or riches. There shall neither be any compulsion in religion nor shall they be harmed.”

The document speaks for itself. The Muslim armies were fighting for the freedom of worship, not for religious conversion. They considered it their mission on earth to free humankind from the yoke of exploitation and abuse. The conquered people were regarded as dhimmis (from the word dhimana, meaning trust or responsibility). They were considered a trust not to be violated as has happened time and again in history. Omar (r) stayed for a few days in Jerusalemand after inspecting the army positions in Syria, returned to Madina.

The Byzantines tried to regroup in Egypt and use it as a base to recover Syria. In 641, Omar (r) sent an expedition under Amr bin al As to Alexandria. The Copts were neutral in this test of strength between the Byzantines and the Muslims. Alexandria fell and the Muslim armies continued their advance as far as Tripoli in Libya.

Meanwhile, the eastern front with Persia was active. The Persians did not take lightly their losses in the border areas west of the Euphrates River. They reorganized, put their western defenses under the famous Khorasani General Rustam and reinforced him with the services of two able officers, Narsi and Jaban. The withdrawal of Khalid bin Walid from the Iraqi front to Syria had weakened Muslim defenses. So, Al Muthannah went to Madina and sought additional troops. Caliph Omar (r) permitted him to raise a new army, allowing for the first time the recruitment of men from the Arab tribes that had at one time become apostates. Abu Obaid Saqafi was selected to lead this new army. Skirmishes started immediately between the opposing forces. Abu Obaid met the Persian officer Jaban at the Battle of Namaraq and defeated him. He followed it up with a victory over Narsi at the Battle of Maqatia. Undaunted, the Persian commander Rustam sent a new army under Mardan Shah and reinforced it with a hundred war elephants. The Arabs had no experience fighting elephant-mounted troops. In the ensuing battle, Abu Obaid was trampled under one of the elephants and the Arab forces were sent reeling back across the Euphrates.

It was now obvious that what had started as a border war had become a test of strength between the Muslims and the Persian Empire. Omar (r) called a meeting of all the Arab nobles for consultation and offered to personally lead a campaign to Persia. However, upon the advice of Ali ibn Abu Talib (r), the Caliph chose Sa’ad ibn Waqqas to lead an army of 20,000 towards Persia. Sa’ad ibn Waqqas was a Companion of the Prophet and a veteran of the Battle of Badr. Among those embarking on the mission were seventy Companions of the Prophet who had fought at the Battle of Badr. The inclusion of Badri Companions increased the fervor of Muslims to a feverish pitch. Even some of the Christian tribes in the border areas offered to support the Muslim army. On the opposing side, the Persian General Rustam was at the head of 50,000 seasoned soldiers.

As directed by the Caliph, Sa’ad ibn Waqqas sent a peace mission to Rustam headed by Muthannah ibn Harith. Rustam, cognizant of the motivation of the Arab soldiers, directed the Arab delegation to Emperor Yazdgard. The Persian Emperor received the Muslims with great pomp and offered to pay them a rich bounty provided they returned to their homeland. In reply, Muthannah ibn Harith offered the Emperor three choices. One, accept submission to God, become a Muslim and a brother in faith. Two, accept protection of the Muslim state and pay jizya. Three, if the first two were unacceptable, face war. The Emperor was upset at these suggestions, told them he would have them killed were they not on a peace mission and sent them back with a handful of dust from the Persian soil, admonishing that the Arabs would get no more than that pitiful amount of dust from Persia.

War became inevitable and the trumpet was blown. At this juncture, Rustam made a tactical blunder. The Persian soldiers wore heavy armor, unsuitable for warfare in the desert. The Arabs, on the other hand, had no armor and were used to mobile desert warfare. Against his own better judgment, Rustam chose for the upcoming confrontation the plain of Qadasia in the desert, about forty miles from the Euphrates. The desert heat sapped the strength of the Persian soldiers in their heavy armor. In the initial combat, the elephants in the Persian army created enormous difficulty for the Muslim warriors. For two days, the battle went on and was indecisive. On the third day the wheels of fortune turned as the Arab soldiers, seeking to neutralize the elephants, shot sharp arrows at their eyes. The injured elephants turned around and dispersed, trampling their own troops. Rustam fought bravely, but was slain in battle.

The Battle of Qadasia (637) was one of the turning points in world history. It marked the end of the Persian Empire and the beginning of the Islamic Empire. Persia became a part of the Islamic world and for fourteen hundred years has been a pivotal region in Muslim affairs.

From Qadasia, Sa’ad ibn Waqqas advanced to the old Biblical city of Babylon, which offered only feeble resistance. The cities of Kosi and Babrasheer followed suit. Madayen, the capital of the Persian Empire, was now within striking distance. The bulk of the Persian army had been lost in the Battle of Qadasia. Yazdgard tried to slow down the advance of Arab troops by destroying the bridge that linked the western shores of the Tigris River to Madayen. These tactics, however, proved futile. The Arabs put their horses into the river, waded across to the other shore and Madayen fell in 637. The treasures of the Persian capital were now in Muslim hands. Untold amounts of gold, silver, jewels, carpets and artifacts were captured and transported to Madina. Included in the war booty was an elephant that aroused a great deal of curiosity among the ladies in Madina.

Yazdgard fled Madayen towards Merv, in northeastern Persia. Realizing that the war with the Muslims was not just a skirmish but a full-scale invasion, he called on all Persians and their allies to defend Persia. A huge army of 150,000 was assembled and put under the command of Mardan Shah who had already seen action against the Arabs at the Battle of the Euphrates. To inspire the Persians, Mardan Shah was vested with the durafsh, the national emblem of Persia. The governor of Kufa, Ammar ibn Yassir sent this information to the Caliph and asked for additional troops. Omar (r) sent a corps of 30,000 under the command of Numan ibn Muquran. Peace talks proved futile and the two armies met at the Battle of Nahawand. In the initial engagements, Numan ibn Muquran was seriously wounded but the Muslim commanders kept this fact secret from friend and foe alike. Towards the end of the first day, the enemy lines broke and the Muslims were victorious. Numan did not survive his wounds and died that evening.

Persian resistance continued from its eastern provinces. Yazdgard set himself up in Merv and took personal command of his forces. Realizing that an injured enemy is a dangerous enemy, Caliph Omar (r) resolved to put an end to all Persian resistance. From Nahawand, the Arab armies split up, and mounted a multi-pronged drive against Persian strongholds. Abi al Aas captured Persepolis. Aasim ibn Amr took Sistan. Hakam ibn Umair conquered Makran and Baluchistan. Azerbaijan fell to Othba ibn Farqad. Buqair ibn Abdulla subdued Armenia. A contingent under Ahnaf ibn Qais marched on Khorasan. By the year 650, the Persian Empire was completely under the control of Arab armies. Yazdgard fled Persia and died in exile.

Within a decade after the election of Omar ibn al Khattab (r) as the Caliph, the map of West Asia and North Africa had changed. Madina was now the capital of the largest empire in the world, extending from Tripoli in North Africa to Samarqand in Central Asia. This empire was ruled not by a king or a general but by a revolutionary creed: “There is no deity but God and Muhammed is His Messenger”. The Caliph was no more than a servant of God, and the keeper of Divine Laws.

When Caliph Omar (r) was informed of the victories over Persia, he went to the mosque in Madina and addressed the people:

“ O believers! The Persians have lost their kingdom. They cannot harm us any more. God has made you inherit their country, their properties and their riches, so that He may test you. Therefore, you should not change your ways. Otherwise, God will bring forth another nation in place of you. I feel anxiety for our community from our own people”.

These were prophetic words. As we shall see in other articles, the riches of Persia did change the ways of some in Madina and led to the civil wars that tore the Islamic community apart.

Omar (r) was a superb administrator. He established a Shura (consultative) council and sought advice on matters of state. He divided the far-flung empire into the provinces of Mecca, Madina, Syria, Jazira (the fertile region between the Rivers Tigris and Euphrates in Iraq), Basra, Khorasan, Azerbaijan, Persia and Egypt. A governor, answerable to the Caliph, was appointed for each province. The responsibilities and the limits of each governor’s authority were clearly defined. Governors who used their office to get rich were severely punished. The executive and the judiciary were separated and kadis were appointed to administer justice.

Caliph Omar (r) had the open mindedness to accept and adopt what was good in other civilizations. Where applicable, he learned from and adopted the technologies and administrative practices of the conquered people. Windmills were in extensive use in Persia at the time and Omar (r) ordered the construction of windmills in several of the Arab cities, including Madina. When Abu Huraira returned with a large booty from Bahrain, there were differences among the Madinites as to how to divide it up. Khalid bin Walid, observing the divisions, suggested to the Caliph that a department of documentation be set up in Madina similar to the ones he had seen in Persia. Caliph Omar (r) inquired about the Persian practices and after satisfying himself that they were indeed applicable to the Caliphate, ordered that a department of documentation be set up. As most Arabs were illiterate, he hired Persian scribes to man this new department. The scribes documented each item of booty and the claims on each, so that the Caliph could equitably divide it up among the claimants. Later, the department was expanded to document all transactions of the treasury and of the army. Following the example of Omar ibn al Khattab (r), the preparation and maintenance of documentation became an honored profession among Muslims, and Caliphs and sultans alike, down to the Ottomans in modern times, kept this tradition alive.

It was during the Caliphate of Omar (r) that Islamic jurisprudence and its methodologies based on the Qur’an, Sunnah, ijma and qiyas were fully established. The edicts of Omar (r), reflecting the consensus of the Companions, provided the foundation for the Maliki School of Fiqh that emerged a hundred years later.
The military was organized professionally. Soldiers were paid and defensive cantonments were established at Madina, Kufa, Basra, Mosul, Fustat (Cairo), Damascus, Edesa and Jordan. Finance, accounting, taxation and treasury departments were organized with full accountability. Police, prisons and postal units were established.

The land was surveyed and agriculture was encouraged. Old canals were excavated and new ones built. Large areas of land were brought under cultivation. Roads were laid out and were regularly patrolled. A traveler could move with safety all the way from Egypt to Khorasan in Central Asia.
The vast territories of West Asia and North Africa were welded into a free trade zone. Trade fostered prosperity. Education was encouraged and teachers paid. The study of Qur’an, Hadith, language, literature, writing and calligraphy received patronage. Omar (r) was himself a poet of repute and a noted orator. Over 4,000 mosques were built during the Caliphate of Omar (r).

Technology such as the construction of windmills was encouraged. Old bridges and roads were repaired and new ones built. A population census was taken after the example of the Chinese in the Tang dynasty. And it was Omar (r) who started the Islamic calendar based on the Hijra of the Prophet.

It is reported that Omar (r) wept when the following verse in the Qur’an was revealed to the Prophet: “We offered the trust to the mountains, heavens and the earth, but they declined, being afraid thereof, but humankind accepted it, indeed humankind was unjust and foolish”(Qur’an, 33:72-73). Omar (r) understood that the trust referred to here is human free will. Humankind, drunk with the love of God, accepted this trust, while all other creation declined it. When the will of man is exercised in a manner that befits human nobility, it elevates him to a position higher than that of the angels. Humankind has a tryst with destiny, to realize its own sublime nature, in the matrix of human affairs. When free will is abused, it reduces humans to the most wretched of creatures. No man understood this better than Omar (r) and few since the Prophet carried this trust with as much wisdom, humility, determination, sensitivity, persistence and courage. Measured by any yardstick, Omar (r) was one of the greatest figures in human history.

Omar ibn al Khattab (r) laid the foundation of Islamic civilization. He was the historical figure who institutionalized Islam and determined the manner in which Muslims would relate to each other and to non-Muslims and would strive to fulfill the mission of Tawhid on earth.

Ironically, this man of justice was assassinated for a verdict he had given in a civil case brought before him. One of the Companions, Mugheera bin Sho’ba, rented a house to a Persian carpenter named Abu Lulu Feroze. The rent was two dirhams a day, a sum Abu Lulu felt was too high. He complained to the Caliph Omar (r) who gathered all the facts, listened to both sides and gave the judgment that the rent was fair. This seemingly minor incident caused one of the biggest upheavals in Islamic history. Abu Lulu was so distraught at the verdict that he resolved to take the life of the Caliph. The next morning, as Omar (r) appeared at the mosque to lead the prayer, Abu Lulu hid in a corner, his double-edged sword concealed under his long robes. As the Caliph stood at the head of the congregation reciting the Qur’an, Abu Lulu jumped at him and thrust his double-edged sword into the Caliph’s stomach. The internal bleeding could not be stopped and Omar (r), the citadel of the community of believers, passed away the following day. The year was 645.

Contributed by Prof. Dr. Nazeer Ahmed, PhD

Creating the Quranic Character


quran-04       

Reflect the Quran in conduct, understand it, memorize it and recite it
It is an established fact that for Muslims the Qur’an is the foundation of the Islamic faith. It is the medium of communication that Allah (swt) has chosen to communicate His (swt) message to mankind. It is this very Book that has been revealed to our master Muhammad (saw) as a source of guidance, and a criteria for right and wrong, which was required to be conveyed to the rest of mankind to bring them out of the darkness and into the light of Islam.
It is for this reason Muslims throughout the centuries have held the Book of Allah in the highest regard, utmost respect and a source of guidance for this life and the Akhira.

It is well known that the Qur’an was revealed over a period of 23 years in a very interactive manner which enabled the sahabahs to practise the Qur’anic injunctions in their lives and to convey it to the Makkan society. Each year in the month of Ramadhan the Prophet (saw) would recite all of the Qur’an that was revealed to date in the presence of Jibreel (as). This was the ultimate means of checking the accuracy of his own recitation and in turn allowed the accuracy of the other memorisers to be verified.

In the last year of the Prophet’s (saw) life the Qur’an was recited twice to Jibreel (as) in the month of Ramadhan to ensure there were no errors. By the time of the Prophet’s (saw) death, the whole Qur’an had been committed to writing as well being solidly established in the memories of thousands of Muslims, some of whom memorised the whole of it, while others memorised portions of it. It is in this manner that the Qur’an has been meticulously compiled and passed down from generation to generation in order to preserve the revelations of Allah (swt) in its purest form without any alterations both in content and its styles of recitations.

It is narrated on the authority of Uthman (ra) that the Prophet (saw) said ‘The best amongst you is he who learns the Qur’an and teaches it’ (Bukhari).

This hadith of the Prophet (saw) amongst many others were the very source of inspiration and motivation for Muslims of the past and present to engage in learning to read and understand the Qur’an and then teach it to others.

The Qur’an is unique among religious texts in that it is not only read, but it is recited as a means of worship to the Creator. There are countless Ahaadiths on the virtues and rewards of reciting the Qur’an as has been narrated by the Prophet (saw).

Abdullah Ibn Mas’ud (ra) narrated that the Prophet (saw) said ‘Whoever reads one letter of the Book of Allah is credited with one hasanah (blessing) and one hasanah is equal to tenfold the like thereof in its reward. I do not say that Alif-Lam-Meem is one letter, but Alif is one letter, Lam is one letter and Meem is one letter.’ (Tirmidhi)

The Qur’an will be an intercessor for the believers on the Day of Judgment as the Prophet (saw) said ‘The Qur’an is an intercessor (which by Allah’s permission) intercedes, and an opponent (which is) truthful. He who appoints it as his leader, (then it) will lead him to Paradise. And he who puts it behind him, (then it) will lead him to the Fire.’ (Bayhaqi)

It is in this context of trying to attain the pleasure of Allah (swt) and living for the Akhirah that the Islamic ummah witnessed some great people in its history. These were people who made the Qur’an the centre of their lives and excelled in acquiring knowledge such that they mastered the Arabic language and all the relevant Islamic sciences in order to access the Book of Allah (swt) and understand its true message. These were people who truly lived up to their religion, treading in the path of knowledge and shaping their personalities in accordance with the Shariah.
Allah (swt) says in the Quran,

كِتَابٌ أَنزَلْنَاهُ إِلَيْكَ مُبَارَكٌ لِّيَدَّبَّرُوا آيَاتِهِ وَلِيَتَذَكَّرَ أُوْلُوا الْأَلْبَابِ


‘This is a Book full of Blessings that we have revealed unto you so people ponder upon its verses and men of intellect may reflect’. (Surah Sad 29)

Unfortunately, now we live in a time where the Qur’an reciters are many but only few are engaging in studying and seeking the guidance of the Qur’an and acting upon its rulings. We need to remind ourselves of the importance of contemplation, reflection and pondering over the meanings and rulings of the Qur’an, and making sure that it is read in a way that penetrates the heart and leaves a lasting and permanent impact on the believers. The result of this kind of reading is the development of a dynamic Islamic personality where Muslims embrace the Islamic Aqeedah, make the Shariah the code of conduct for their lives and engage in the da’wah to revive the Islamic way of life at a state level.

It is in relation to this subject of contemplation and reflection of the Qur’an when reading that the Prophet (saw) said in a hadiths ‘Groups of people will emerge from my Ummah who will drink the Qur’an as they drink milk’ (Tabarani).

In commenting on this hadiths Al-Munawi says in his Fayd al-Qadir: “… that is, they will raise their voices with their tongues without contemplating and reflecting on its meanings and pondering over its rulings; instead it (i.e. the Qur’an) passes over their tongues as milk which they drink passes over them which is quickly”
While it is true that we receive reward for the recitation of the Qur’an even when we do not understand its meanings, this should not however make us complacent such that it prevents us from studying the Qur’an and pondering over its meanings. Otherwise, this Qur’an will only be understood and practised by a select few whilst the masses will continue engaging in this act of ibadah (i.e. recitation of the Qur’an) with limited understanding and application in their daily lives.
Allah (saw) says:

أَفَلَا يَتَدَبَّرُونَ الْقُرْآنَ أَمْ عَلَى قُلُوبٍ أَقْفَالُهَا


‘Do they not then ponder on the Quran, or are there locks on the hearts?’ (Surah Muhammad 24)

This was the situation of hypocrites who used to read the Quran but never attempted to sincerely understand it as the speech of Allah. And therefore, despite their recitation in their own language they were neither able to gain knowledge nor able to act according to it what was prescribed in it.

Thus, the reading of the Qur’an must be followed by one’s desire to understand it in depth and using it as a guide in one’s practical life. If understood and followed correctly, the Qur’an becomes a living guide for those who act upon it.

‘This Book which We have revealed is a blessed one. Follow its guidance and have piety so that you perhaps may receive mercy and will not say that the Book was revealed only to two groups of people before you, or that you were ignorant of its knowledge, or say: Had the Book been revealed to us, we would have followed its guidance better than they (Jews and Christians), so indeed there has come clear proof from your Lord, and guidance and mercy.’ (Al-An’am 155 – 157)

Source

Saudi prince awarded libel damages against British daily

Prince Nayef bin Abdul-Aziz al Saud, pictured in 2008
© AFP/File Fethi Belaid
 LONDON (AFP) - (AFP) - A Saudi prince accused by a British newspaper of ordering police to gun down unarmed demonstrators during this year's Arab uprisings won "substantial" libel damages Wednesday over the allegations.

Independent Print Ltd, publishers of The Independent newspaper, and its Middle East correspondent Robert Fisk expressed "sincere apologies" at London's High Court over claims made against Prince Nayef bin Abdul-Aziz al Saud.

The newspaper said allegations that the prince had ordered police to fire on protesters were published "in good faith" but accepted they had turned out to be untrue and based on a forgery.

On April 15, The Independent published a feature article about the Arab Spring headlined "A long time coming", in which Fisk claimed the prince had ordered police chiefs "to shoot and kill unarmed demonstrators without mercy".

Fisk, a veteran award-winning correspondent, said the order was "extraordinary and outrageous" and should be investigated by the International Criminal Court at The Hague.

The article, also published on the newspaper's website under the heading "The Arab awakening began not in Tunisia this year, but in Lebanon in 2005", was widely reproduced online and paraphrased in the Arab press, the court heard.

Rupert Earle, representing the prince, told Justice Nicola Davies the claims derived from a fake "order" published online as Shia protesters in Saudi Arabia were planning a demonstration in March.
He said several websites had featured the statement, allegedly issued by Prince Nayef, permitting police chiefs to use live rounds on protesters who "should be shown no mercy " and "struck with iron fists".
The Independent's lawyer Helen Morris said Fisk's reference to the order was "made in good faith, albeit in the mistaken belief that the order was genuine."

"Both The Independent and Robert Fisk offer their sincere apologies to Prince Nayef for the damage and distress caused by the article and the inevitable coverage it received," she added.
A correction published on May 4 by The Independent said: "Prince Nayef has responded that the order is a forgery, was not issued by him and that he would never issue such an order."
Prince Nayef, second in line to the Saudi throne and interior minister since 1970, said he would pay the undisclosed sum of money he received to charity.

Source

Turkey’s future lies within the Khilafah State and not the EU

Image Source
As crisis talks are due to start regarding Turkey joining the EU opinion polls from across Europe show a clear opposition to full Turkish membership. In a poll by Sky News over 70% voted no to the question should Turkey be allowed to join the EU? This signals the overwhelming feeling in Europe that Turkey which has a majority Muslim population should not be allowed to join the EU which until now has been made up of only majority Christian populations. In a similar poll carried out in France in 2004 in which the majority of people opposed Turkey joining the EU, 30% of participants objected on the basis of cultural differences. 

The opposition to Turkey joining the EU is without doubt based on the simple fact that it is a Muslim nation, which also includes a great Islamic tradition as it was for many centuries the centre of the Uthmani Khilafah State (Ottoman State). Even though the current Turkish ruling elite have been committed to a secular system, going as far as banning the Hijab in government buildings such as universities it still sits on the sidelines of European politics. The man responsible for shaping the future constitution of the EU former French President Valery Giscard d'Estaing told Le Monde Newspaper in 2002 that Turkey joining the EU would be “the end of the Europe.”

Ever since Turkey committed itself to a secular path it has only seen its international standing wither away. Economically it has suffered greatly due to harsh financial measures introduced by the World Bank which were imposed on Turkey so that it would be permitted to take further loans; this caused the Turkish currency to be devalued. Turkey’s population lacks cohesion as the people find their Islamic values in contrast with the secular system imposed upon them, this was highlighted by the ban on the hijab which was met by fierce resistance.

It has become evident that whatever the Turkish ruling elite does to try and gain acceptance and membership within the EU it finds the door slammed in its face. The future of Turkey lies in the Khilafah State which gave this country glory and honour making it the leading nation in the world for centuries.

“Those who take the unbelievers for guardians rather than believers. Do they seek honor from them? Then surely all honour is for Allah.” (An-Nisa – 139)

Muslim snooker player who fears Allah

It was narrated that Ma’qil ibn Yassaar said: the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “For one of you to be stabbed in the head with an iron needle is better for him than that he should touch a woman who is not permissible for him.”

Narrated by al-Tabaraani in al-Kabeer, 486. Shaykh al-Albaani said in Saheeh al-Jaami’, 5045, that this hadeeth is saheeh.

Often when a brother reaches the top of their career or the heights of fame they fall down in their deen, putting on the cross of St George of the Union Jack and speaking out against Islam and the practicing Muslims in the interests of their new kuffar awliyah.

Mashallaah it is therefore good to see a brother setting a good example to the youth even if it means taking flack for it, when others are quick to turn against the teachings of the deen over even small easy matters nevermind big more difficult beliefs and actions of our deen.
Muslim snooker player, Rory Mcleod has had a big run-in with a top match official after refusing to shake a female referee’s hand after a match.

Brother Rory wouldn’t hands with Chinese referee Ivy Zhu after winning his qualifying match for the Australian Open, prompting top referee Jan Verhaas to criticise the player for what he saw as a snub even though the female referee herself didn’t seem to have any issues with this Rory putting his deen before western customs.
McLeod, from Northamptonshire, was in 2009 the first black player to take part in the world championship at the crucible in Sheffield and reverted to Islam in 2000 and has explained in the past how his faith helps him with his game.

Rather than relaxing to music or chatting up some young female fans like other sports he is instead usually seen listening to verses from the Quran on his iPod, a habit which he claims, “calms me down… I find there are no better words or speech than that to help put me in the right state of mind.”

May Allaah (swt) reward Rory for his courage in putting this small teaching of islam first, ameen.
We are Muslims first and we should be submitting to Allaah first then everything else comes after this, and there is no obedience or pleasing the creation that should be done if it is displeasing to Allaah.

As Muslims we are forbidden to touch women we do not have a close relationship to or are married to, as touching is often the first step leading to flirting, and later fornication and Allaah says in the Quran “Do not come near fornication” meaning stay away from whatever leads to it.

Many Muslims make light of this teaching, or think it is acceptable to go against it just because their boss / lecturer / teacher or kuffar friends may think less of them, but what is worse? that a non-practicing muslim or kafir thinks less of you and is angry with you or that you anger and displease the creator of those beings?

Source

Germany: Government concerned about homegrown, right-wing terrorism

source : images.google.com
A series of murders has German authorities worried that homegrown, right-wing terrorism could be more widespread and better organized than previously believed. Police took a second suspected accomplice into custody.

A string of murders allegedly committed by a trio of neo-Nazis has raised concern among German authorities that some right-wing extremist groups may have transitioned from political agitation to outright terrorism.

Over the weekend, federal prosecutors alleged that right-wing extremists were responsible for the murder of a female police officer in the southern German city of Heilbronn in 2007 as well as the murders of eight food venders, of whom seven were Turkish and one was Greek.

After a bank robbery in the eastern Germany city of Eisenach, police followed the trail of the two suspected male perpetrators, later identified as Uwe B. and Uwe M., to a burnt out home in the Saxon town of Zwickau, where they had taken their lives.

At the scene, police found a pistol as well as DVDs in which the men reportedly admit to the nine murders and claim they are members of a group called the "National Socialist Underground," which is a "network of comrades with the basic principle of actions instead of words."

In a 15-minute-long video, the two men also announced further attacks, according to the news magazine Der Spiegel.

Right-wing terrorism

A suspected accomplice, Beate Z., has been taken into custody and has offered to be a principal witness in exchange for a lighter sentence. Like the two deceased men, she was a member of the extreme right-wing group "Thuringia Homeland Security."

Germany's interior minister, Hans-Peter Friedrich, told reporters in Berlin Sunday that the country was witnessing "a new form of far right terrorism," one that does not "publicly claim responsibility [for attacks] or vaunt its actions within the far right scene."

Federal prosecutors said on Sunday police near Hanover took a suspected accomplice to the trio of alleged murders into custody. Prosecutors in Karlsruhe said 37-year-old Holger G. is thought to have been a member of the "National Socialist Underground" since the late 1990s. He is suspected of providing his drivers license and passport to the other three alleged terrorists.

Hans-Werner Wargel, head of the state of Lower Saxony's department for the Protection of the Constitution, said Germany may be "dealing with the worst case of right-wing violence in decades."

Call for answers

Cem Özdemir, the Green Party's parliamentary chief, expressed disbelief that the trio could avoid the authorities for so long given that they had been active since the 1990s.

"We have always pointed out that within the [right-wing] scene, groups have developed that are very militant and possibly have made the transition to terrorism," Bernd Wagner, an expert on right-wing extremism, told the daily Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger.

"The motive is always the same." Bernd added. "An organized military struggle against democracy and foreigners."

The German parliament, the Bundestag, plans to hold a special committee meeting on neo-Nazi terrorism in response to the case, which has led to renewed calls for a ban of the extreme right-wing National Democratic Party (NPD).

"The NDP, as a political arm of the Nazi scene and enemy of the constitution, currently receives taxpayer money and should be finally banned," said Social Democratic parliamentarian Ralf Stegner.

Editor's note: Deutsche Welle is bound by German law and the German press code, which stresses the importance of protecting the privacy of suspected criminals or victims and obliges us to refrain from revealing full names in such cases.

Source
Older Post ►
 

Copyright 2011 Everything About Islam is proudly powered by blogger.com | Design by Tutorial Blogspot Published by Template Blogger